Sunday, October 07, 2018

What Qualifies You to Teach Computer Science?

Several years ago a parent at an open house asked me the question in the title of this post. He seemed happy with the response. My resume is pretty good I think and better now than it was then. These days we are getting a lot of people teaching computer science who are new to the subject. Sometimes they are very new. That’s a concern.

I suspect it will be a special concern for parents. They are after all used to looking to see evidence that a teacher is “highly qualified” in other subjects. Computer Science has been exempt from this requirement for most states as it was not defined as a core course. That is starting to change in perception even more than in fact.

So will parents ask the question? And will they be happy with the answers? Personally, while I’d like CS teachers to all have a solid CS background and a major in the field that’s not happening soon for enough teachers. Most are going to get thrust into the role of CS teacher with a couple of workshops (a week or three maybe) and some on going learning as they go.

I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately. Earlier tonight I came across and old blog post on the Channel 9 website that I wrote about 11 years ago called Why passion is important for teachers
I think passion for the subject is what I want most in a teacher of any subject. Passion is what spurs interest and learning in students. Students almost never care about a subject as much let alone more than their teachers. And passion fuels a drive in a teacher to learn, to experiment, to continue to grow as a teacher and as a subject expert.  Forcing the unwilling to take a workshop and then teach a CS course is likely to be a complete failure not matter how good the teacher is.

But take a person and help them find a passion for the subject and the long term outlook is strong. In fact I suspect that passion shown by a teacher is the single best predictor of  success. I’m not a researcher and I don’t have objective proof but my observations tells me I’m right. Hopefully the people recruiting teachers are looking for and growing that passion. It’s our best hope is CS for All becoming a reality.

5 comments:

Mike Zamansky said...


What qualifies you to teach CS?

I'll tell you - Our chief weapon is passion... passion and content knowledge...content knowledge and passion... our two weapons are passion and content knowledge... and ruthless creativity.... our three weapons are passion, content knowldege and ruthless creativity... and an almost fanatical devotion to the college board. Our four... no amongst our weapons.... amongst our weaponry ... are such elements as passion, content knowldege....

I'll come in again..





I'll tell you - Amongst our weaponry are such diverse elements as passion, content knowledge, ruthless creativity, and an almost fanatical devotion to the college board.... and nice CSTA stickers...

Oh Damn,

......

Garth said...

Willingness? Is that a word?

Alfred Thompson said...

Mike, your cynicism is showing again. :-)

Mike Zamansky said...

No cynicism this time :-)

I agree with your post. If you have passion, you WILL learn the rest.

It's just that as I was thinking over the other qualities my mind went here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ixgc_FGam3s

Garth said...

When talking to some new CS teachers I think more this way:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kAG39jKi0lI